close icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-facebook icon-mail icon-google-plus icon-search icon-phone icon-instagram
Menu
What are you looking for?

News and articles

Subscribe
Stay up to date with the latest IP news and expert insights from our patent and trademark attorneys. Don't miss out—subscribe to our newsletter today!
Filter on
Filter on
Filter on message type
Filter on tags
Case law T2360-19 Image 10 Jun 2025 T 2360/19: A valid transfer of rights maintains the right to priority
Patents EPO Case Law
Case law Infinity range 3 Jun 2025 T 1977/22: Can an open-ended range be enabled across its whole scope?
Patents EPO Case Law
Article Drug Repurposing 28 May 2025 With the end-point in mind: Focus on new pharmaceuticals
Pharma Patents
Case law Person needing to choose between the right to a fair hearing and legal certainty within due time 26 May 2025 T 1874/23: Limits to the right to oral proceedings under Art. 116 EPC on the request of the Applicant
Patents EPO Case Law
Case law In T 1193/23, the Boards of Appeal (the Boards) revoked a patent relating to a method for safely starting and/or stopping a spinning rotor of a rotor spinning machine (electric motor). The decision notably addresses the relevance of chatbot (specifically ChatGPT) answers in claim interpretation, concluding that such answers cannot automatically be assumed to reflect the skilled person's understanding. 20 May 2025 T 1193/23: Chatbot answers alone cannot establish the skilled person's understanding of claim terms
Patents EPO Case Law
News NLO Headquarters 13 May 2025 Five new partners join combination Ipsilon and NLO
Press Release
Case law Mathematical formulas 12 May 2025 T 1423/22: Mathematical operations can contribute to technical character in diagnostic methods
Patents EPO Case Law
Case law Image on digitisation and coding related to case T 0832/22 18 Apr 2025 T 0832/22: Determining public availability of internet publications - standards of proof
Patents EPO Case Law
Case law Biometric data display 11 Apr 2025 T 0371/23: User interface for privacy consent does not contribute to technical character
EPO Case Law Patents